Ep. 43 Do The Supreme Court's Actions Constitute An Attack On Democracy?

Show Notes For Episode 43

Watch Episode 43 - Do The Supreme Court’s Actions Constitute An Attack On Democracy

Today On Legalese we have the second video in my series about the Supreme Court's upcoming case that will reconsider chevron deference. Do their actions constitute some kind of usurpation of power and are they an attack on democracy itself? We discuss this while debunking an article from Vox that claims both of those things are correct. We also look at the real history of administrative law in regards to Chevron Deference.

Previous Episode (Part One)

Did The Supreme Court Just Declare War On All Federal Regulation?

Vox Article

A new Supreme Court case seeks to make the nine justices even more powerful

---

Articles, Documents, Case Briefs & Related Sources

• Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo

• National Review - Supreme Court to Hear Case That Could Rein in Federal Agencies

• Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc

• Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. NRDC, 467 U.S. 837 (1984).

• Chevron Matters Not As Much As You Think

• Administrative Law on Cornell Law

• Public Opinion about Regulation

• Loper Bright Enterprises Supreme Court Docket Page

• Judicial Deference To Administrative Agencies, Antonin Scalia, Duke Law Journal, p. 511 – 532 (1989)

• Judicial Review of Questions of Law and Policy, Stephen Breyer, Administrative Law Review, volume 38, p. 363 – 98 (1986)

  ---

Past Episodes

• Supreme Court Roundup - Chevron Deference Edition

• Sedition: An American Virtue

---

Follow & Support

• Legalese Podcast Homepage

• Subscribe To The Legalese Newsletter

• Contact The Show

  ---

  Tags: Law, Constitution, Politics, legal theory, Moral Philosophy, Current Events, supreme court, administrative law, chevron deference, Vox, Ian Millhiser, Loper Bright